{
  "spec": "PP-SPEC-077:21.15",
  "work": "PP-SPEC-102 Proof Protocol Mapping: Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP)",
  "work_version": "0.1.0",
  "date": "2026-11-05",
  "human_authors": [
    {
      "name": "Craig Thomas Ellrod",
      "orcid": "0009-0004-1058-7666",
      "role": "Author and inventor; conception, direction, every normative decision, review and acceptance"
    }
  ],
  "ai_systems": [
    {
      "provider": "Anthropic",
      "model": "Claude (Opus 5.5)",
      "role": "ACP analysis, drafting, structuring, schemas"
    }
  ],
  "shares": {
    "conception_and_normative_decisions": {
      "human": 90,
      "ai": 10
    },
    "design_and_naming": {
      "human": 65,
      "ai": 35,
      "note": "Claude proposed: the C/G/ACP-T numbering, the gap boundaries, the individual test scenarios and pass conditions"
    },
    "expression": {
      "human": 5,
      "ai": 95
    },
    "review_and_acceptance": {
      "human": 100,
      "ai": 0
    }
  },
  "method": {
    "kind": "self_attested",
    "notes": "Shares drafted by the AI from its itemized record of what it proposed and what the author directed, for the author to confirm or correct before release. MAY be re-measured with a tool such as ProofJack.com."
  },
  "contributions": {
    "human": [
      "Proof Economy, Proof of Efficacy and every method the mapping assigns (exclusionary homomorphism, fidelity at capture, Proof Correlation ID and trashbit encoding, ProofSwarm: The Dead Canary Protocol, Reproof, the Proof of X claims, Unit of Proof)",
      "Decision to map ACP and to require that every mapping show where the framework falls short of proof of efficacy",
      "Decision to engage ACP by contribution rather than stay a silent witness",
      "Decision to define the ACP interface as its own specification (PP-SPEC-103)",
      "Spec numbering 102 and 103",
      "Decision that the value to ACP is proof of efficacy of the product being purchased, ahead of proof of agent purchases",
      "Canonical definition: proof that a product under pressure, does what the vendor says it does",
      "Review and acceptance (pending)"
    ],
    "ai": [
      "Read and analyzed the ACP repository (RFCs, OpenAPI and JSON Schema, 2026-04-17 and unreleased)",
      "Control inventory C01 to C14, gap statements G1 to G11, test set ACP-T01 to ACP-T16 and their pass conditions",
      "Assignment of methods to gaps, from the author's method definitions",
      "Text as written, the machine-readable mapping, and the repository files",
      "Gap G11 (product claims are marketing) and tests ACP-T14 to ACP-T16, at the author's direction",
      "Finding that ACP Product and Variant schemas are closed with no extension point"
    ]
  },
  "pending_acceptance": [
    "Gap list G1 to G11",
    "Test set ACP-T01 to ACP-T16",
    "Method assignments in Section 5"
  ],
  "supersedes": null,
  "human_form": "AI_DISCLOSURE.md"
}