{
  "spec": "PP-SPEC-077:21.15",
  "work": "PP-SPEC-079 Proof of Performance Engagement: The Coal Mine Protocol",
  "work_version": "0.1.3",
  "date": "2026-10-13",
  "human_authors": [
    {
      "name": "Craig Thomas Ellrod",
      "orcid": "0009-0004-1058-7666",
      "role": "Author and inventor; conception, direction, every normative decision, review and acceptance"
    }
  ],
  "ai_systems": [
    {
      "provider": "Anthropic",
      "model": "Claude (Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5)",
      "role": "Drafting, structuring, editing, code"
    },
    {
      "provider": "OpenAI",
      "model": "ChatGPT",
      "role": "Banner image (docs/banner.jpg), supplied by the author; decorative, not part of the specification"
    }
  ],
  "shares": {
    "conception_and_normative_decisions": {
      "human": 80,
      "ai": 20
    },
    "design_and_naming": {
      "human": 55,
      "ai": 45,
      "note": "Claude proposed: Environment Classes, Parity Declaration, Claim Sheet, Comparability Class, the name Coal Mine (after the human rejected Gauntlet), Self-Provided rules, Regulatory Regime axis, Extension Policy table"
    },
    "expression": {
      "human": 5,
      "ai": 95
    },
    "review_and_acceptance": {
      "human": 100,
      "ai": 0
    }
  },
  "method": {
    "kind": "self_estimated",
    "notes": "Shares drafted by the AI from its itemized record of what it proposed and what the author directed, for the author to confirm or correct before release. MAY be re-measured with a tool such as ProofJack.com."
  },
  "contributions": {
    "human": [
      "The legacy-model diagnosis: vendor-funded lab reports and vendor-run POCs",
      "In-Situ versus Independent Lab; vendor-run forbidden",
      "Rejecting Gauntlet as overused",
      "Generalizing from vendor products to any control at SUT/DUT/CUT/AUT, any provenance",
      "Applicability to legacy and agentic environments",
      "Asking for a government or reserved class and for extension placement rules",
      "Drift coverage",
      "All review and acceptance",
      "0.1.2: decision to make witness independence from the Lab mandatory, remove the named operator, and limit the maintainer to editorial responsibility, in response to the Open Verification Lab leadership question on operator independence",
      "0.1.2: accepted the Section 14 wording (maintainer editorial only; conformance from the records)",
      "0.1.3: decision to remove remaining maintainer powers from 13.6 and 13.7"
    ],
    "ai": [
      "Text as written",
      "Section structure",
      "Provider and Control Provenance terms",
      "4.4 Self-Provided Engagements",
      "5.5 Regulatory Regime and sovereign Registry",
      "9.5.5 class versus scale",
      "Section 13 Extension Policy",
      "0.1.2: identified the independence gaps by reviewing 079 against that question; drafted the text of 4.2.3, 4.5, Section 14, and the matching changelog, FAQ, and conformance entries",
      "0.1.3: text of the 13.6 and 13.7 changes"
    ]
  },
  "pending_acceptance": [
    "Regulatory Regime value list",
    "Extension promotion threshold of three Engagements"
  ],
  "supersedes": null,
  "human_form": "AI_DISCLOSURE.md"
}